Archive for Tagpoker Forum A friendly place for winning poker players to share their strategy to making money playing poker.
 


       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Brags - Beats & Variance
U Cook Socks

When good hands go bad !!!

You have seen the TV programme, when good pets go bad right ? They should make a programme called when good hands go bad  Very Happy

Poker Stars, $30 + $1.50 NL Hold'em Tournament, 15/30 Blinds, 2 Players
[URL="http://www.leggopoker.com"]LeggoPoker.com[/URL] - [URL="http://www.leggopoker.com/converter"]Hand History Converter[/URL]

BTN: 1,160
Hero (BB): 1,840

Pre-Flop: (45) 6 4 dealt to Hero (BB)
BTN calls 15, Hero checks

Flop: (60) 5 7 3 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN bets 30, Hero raises to 120, BTN calls 90

Turn: (300) 3 (2 Players)
Hero bets 210, BTN calls 210

River: (720) 7 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN bets 800 and is All-In, Hero folds

Results: 720 Pot
BTN showed and WON 720 (+375 NET)
BetMagicMoney

*tilts head*



miss click????
U Cook Socks

BetMagicMoney wrote:
*tilts head*



miss click????


Well no, Standard fold isn't it??

Didn't give any info, but he was a station type, that goes mental with a big hand. Quite obviously had the full house.
ChrisB

pretty standard fold indeed
two2go

I hate this spot, and I don't see how you could ever call (BMM must have misread??). Reminds me of playing smaller pocket pairs when the board pairs again and suddenly your 5-high kicker plays.
BetMagicMoney

Blazing_Saddler wrote:
BetMagicMoney wrote:
*tilts head*



miss click????


Well no, Standard fold isn't it??

Didn't give any info, but he was a station type, that goes mental with a big hand. Quite obviously had the full house.

lol my bad missed double paired board *face palms* Razz Smile
tmle09

wow ouch... Sad
Refraction

Wouldn't say standard, but yeah, it looks like the right fold.

I really hate being OOP in these kind of hands. It just go to show of much better it is to be playing IP.
U Cook Socks

Refraction wrote:
Wouldn't say standard, but yeah, it looks like the right fold.

I really hate being OOP in these kind of hands. It just go to show of much better it is to be playing IP.


Against this villain it was standard, I may have even folded the turn if he jammed over me, but prob not. The only hand he has here that I beat ever is a big over pair that he played like a retard, but it's so much more likely he has a full house.

Kind of sick, but I beat him anyway.
ChrisB

How is it not standard to fold here refraction? If villain himself does not have a boat it sure as hell looks likely hero has one, and villain wouldnt jam into us like that if that were the case.

I think you'll see 7x 95% and 3x 4.5% with pure bluffs 0.5%
U Cook Socks

ChrisB wrote:
How is it not standard to fold here refraction? If villain himself does not have a boat it sure as hell looks likely hero has one, and villain wouldnt jam into us like that if that were the case.

I think you'll see 7x 95% and 3x 4.5% with pure bluffs 0.5%


I could add some more info that would confirm it even further.

The villain only ever bet the flop if he had a pair. Didn't matter if it was top middle or bottom. But he checked all his air down, and his draws. So he definitely has something on the flop.  Which is why I made a decent sized check raise on the flop, cos I was certain he wasn't going anywhere. Wasn't to pleased with the turn card, but i'm still happy to play for stacks really at that point. Then the river is just sickness.
YATHINNK

I hate it when people actually assign probability percentages too it. It makes it more complicated than it ever needs to be.
Refraction

Blazing_Saddler wrote:
ChrisB wrote:
How is it not standard to fold here refraction? If villain himself does not have a boat it sure as hell looks likely hero has one, and villain wouldnt jam into us like that if that were the case.

I think you'll see 7x 95% and 3x 4.5% with pure bluffs 0.5%


I could add some more info that would confirm it even further.

The villain only ever bet the flop if he had a pair. Didn't matter if it was top middle or bottom. But he checked all his air down, and his draws. So he definitely has something on the flop.  Which is why I made a decent sized check raise on the flop, cos I was certain he wasn't going anywhere. Wasn't to pleased with the turn card, but i'm still happy to play for stacks really at that point. Then the river is just sickness.


The only point I was trying to make is that nothing's standard. That .5% ChrisB mentioned and the read Blazing_Saddler made just points that out.

Take care.
ChrisB

Refraction wrote:
Blazing_Saddler wrote:
ChrisB wrote:
How is it not standard to fold here refraction? If villain himself does not have a boat it sure as hell looks likely hero has one, and villain wouldnt jam into us like that if that were the case.

I think you'll see 7x 95% and 3x 4.5% with pure bluffs 0.5%


I could add some more info that would confirm it even further.

The villain only ever bet the flop if he had a pair. Didn't matter if it was top middle or bottom. But he checked all his air down, and his draws. So he definitely has something on the flop.  Which is why I made a decent sized check raise on the flop, cos I was certain he wasn't going anywhere. Wasn't to pleased with the turn card, but i'm still happy to play for stacks really at that point. Then the river is just sickness.


The only point I was trying to make is that nothing's standard. That .5% ChrisB mentioned and the read Blazing_Saddler made just points that out.

Take care.


I agree that nothing is standard, and I can see that I myself made that error earlier in the thread. But I think calling here is almost always a mistake Smile
Refraction

ChrisB wrote:

I agree that nothing is standard, and I can see that I myself made that error earlier in the thread. But I think calling here is almost always a mistake Smile

Agreed. Wink
       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Brags - Beats & Variance
Page 1 of 1