Kim Cardassian
|
What the...?! Mathematical dilemma calculating winrateWinrate per HU match: 60%
Winrate per 2 HU matches in succession: 60% of 60% = 36%
ROI on normal HU match (5% rake): 14,5% ROI
ROI on 4 man WTA shootout (7,5% rake): 34% ROI!
If this is correct then Brokerstar is going to have an easy time hitting 40%+ ROI seeing as he probably wins 65% of his HU matches.
I'm probably making a stupid mistake, though...
|
Jakester1288
|
So it's far more profitable to play shootouts?
|
Pltinum
|
It seems linear too.
If you got a winpercentage of 55, you get roi of 4,6 and 10,6 approximately.
So yeah it seems more profitable, but remember, you do have to play 2 games often. But even than! It seems better for the hourly too.
|
Kim Cardassian
|
Depends on how long you have to wait on average for matches to complete. I think average match time will go up due to this. I've won some HU matches in like 10 seconds and if that happens in a shootout you still gotta wait until the other match is completed.
|
nachtwacht
|
Many people before you have discussed this subject. The best one, explaining in detail wich would be preferred, can be found on 2+2. Definetly worth doing a search for it there.
|
BetMagicMoney
|
please read this
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com...g-4-man-vs-2-man-question-144437/
so yes your right his ROI will be much higher in shootouts, however you do need bigger bankroll requirements as the swings are larger (comparatively) in 4 mans.
Also kim keep in mind that your winrate in match 2 will be lower than in match 1 as your more likely to be playing a better player.
|
kierkegaard1
|
you make $ for winning 1 match in a 2man. you make 0$ for winning 1st match in a 4man. you could have a 100% winrate of 1st round matches and not win anything.
im sure this is missing in your calculations
|
_red_dog
|
| BetMagicMoney wrote: | please read this
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com...g-4-man-vs-2-man-question-144437/
so yes your right his ROI will be much higher in shootouts, however you do need bigger bankroll requirements as the swings are larger (comparatively) in 4 mans.
Also kim keep in mind that your winrate in match 2 will be lower than in match 1 as your more likely to be playing a better player. |
This statement is very.... I dunno, u just dont have to think about this because it's not going to be the case very often at all.
|
BetMagicMoney
|
surely your winrate will be less Vs a better opponent? if thats true then that opponent has a greater chance of winning the first match!
So if your winrate in game 1 is 58% then at a guess lets say that your average winrate in game 2 is 57% because your playinga higher percentage of good players.
I think that makes sense :S
|
savrababa
|
| Quote: | | So if your winrate in game 1 is 58% then at a guess lets say that your average winrate in game 2 is 57% because your playinga higher percentage of good players. |
so basically you win 1% of the time less on the second match, but win +50% prize money...
|
_red_dog
|
Yes but u would just never calculate that into anything that revolves around the winrate.
|
U Cook Socks
|
I would say for the people who post on here complaining they are on a 4 buyin downswing, to totally leave 4 mans alone. Your gonna spontaniously combust when you have a huge run of winning first round matches and not cashing.
For those with a bit of patience, I am sure they are very profitable.
|