Archive for Tagpoker Forum A friendly place for winning poker players to share their strategy to making money playing poker.
 


       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Brags - Beats & Variance
kolonel

Sick of fkn luckboxes

Time and time again, villain hitting 1/2 outers.  

1 game >> 4 allins = 4 hits
1 game >> 2 allins = 2 hits

Every fkn card is on the River too.

Drives me fkn mad.............




Feel better now
StasKo

i feel you man..

cant get a break from running bad
just yesterday i flopped full house.. villain rivered quads!
2 games later 3 kings on board, i turn full house just to find out villain already had the fourth king!

so frustrating......... and its just doesnt want to end!!
kolonel

lol, if anything, it makes us stronger..........pfffft

i know many have moaned and groaned about bad beats, but when you play well, and to get beaten or broken like that, it hurts.

anyways, we need to move onwards and upwards

just nice to vent every now and then  Twisted Evil  Twisted Evil  Twisted Evil
StasKo

yeah and it not only hurts emotionally but also hurts your poker goals.
with so many bad beats tilt slowly kicking in which makes me play less volume.
also i decided to move down in stakes. so i start the day in a lower stake level - if i win and feel good about my play i go back to my usual stake level, but unfortunately every time i go back i get a bad run, and this pattern just repeats itself in the last week..

the only thing that keeps me motivated is the knowing that i manage to minimize my losses which i know most fish will never be able to do Smile
kolonel

I hear you brother.

I like to get of to a winning start in the session, which i somehow manage to do most times, then wanting to finishing strong, come up with crap like that.  I know i am not playing optimal poker all the time, but it seems to get me through.

Stick with it mate, we'll get through it  Wink
StasKo

amen Smile
kolonel

raises it ugly head again >>>

(one game) 5 times in good to a station on the Turn, 4 times hits 2 outer, 1 time hits 3 outer.....

starting to just laugh through this shite now

bring it on
Brokerstar

Ha ha ha, exactly what this forum is for. Let it vent boys, let it vent!   Very Happy
kolonel

had a couple sukouts, but said "meh" >> then this

how do these fukkers win monies...... aggro spewtard that fkn binks it



Poker Stars No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t20.00/t40.00 Blinds - 2 players - View hand 1438202
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

Hero (BB): t869.00 21.73 BBs
BTN/SB: t2131.00 53.27 BBs

Pre Flop: (t60) Hero is BB with T A
BTN/SB raises to t120, Hero raises to t869, BTN/SB calls t749

Flop: (t1738) 9 T T (2 players)

Turn: (t1738) Q (2 players)

River: (t1738) J (2 players)

Final Pot: t1738
Hero shows T A
BTN/SB shows 8 5
BTN/SB wins t1738.00
kolonel

for fukks sake, there has to be some law of averages of these cnts hitting the River every fkn time..........
blsmur

guys I got it figured out

they dont  suk out on me no more


i just fold

makes a difference

small ball is the name of the game

only small ball
until you got them out chipped

then if they suk out

small ball them some more

and then when you got the lead

get them to suk out again

the most they get to suk out is 3 times

and then i win the last hand


see you sukers
Wink
kolonel

level ?
Jakester1288

kolonel wrote:
level ?


Unfortunately not.
Rickaby

I get the concept of small-balling villain down to minimise the impact of suck-outs but what gives me the irrits is working my way to a 2:1 or 3:1 chip lead and then having villain suck-out 1-2 times and even the stacks.  By then, the blinds warrant a more aggressive approach and either a string of woeful hole-cards or 1 more suck-out and it's curtains - all that initial hard work is then for nought.

I know it's meant to all average out and that better play should win out in the long run (not to mention my own inability to recall my own lucky suck-outs) but it still hurts.
Jakester1288

Rickaby wrote:
I get the concept of small-balling villain down to minimise the impact of suck-outs


That's not the concept of small balling at all.

Good players will get sucked out on regularly (more than fish/bad players, a\t least), because they're getting it in better often.
aggsyb

Rickaby wrote:
I get the concept of small-balling villain down to minimise the impact of suck-outs


I know dom wants me to contriube more posotively (sp) to the community but tbf i think ive contributed a decent amt and i feel this is just so hard to resist, you get a pass
forced

hmmmmm.... is'nt small balling a way to get a feel for your opponant, then adjusting to villan's playing style to rape and pillage chips?


Im doing it wrong again.
U Cook Socks

blsmur wrote:
guys I got it figured out

they dont  suk out on me no more


i just fold

makes a difference

small ball is the name of the game

only small ball
until you got them out chipped

then if they suk out

small ball them some more

and then when you got the lead

get them to suk out again

the most they get to suk out is 3 times

and then i win the last hand


see you sukers
Wink


Thank you so much for this post, it really made my day.

Should be stickied imo

I think you should write a book x x x
Rickaby

@Jakester and @aggsyb - I was only trying to paraphrase blsmur rather than providing an explanation of small-balling.  Whatever one does to achieve a chip lead (small-balling, raising 90% of btns, etc, etc, etc), I was merely attempting to empathise with kolonel and his OP.  That's what I actually thought this post was about - a place to bemoan the all-too-common bad beat, share our frustrations and move on.  I certainly didn't expect to be critiqued about my understanding (or lack thereof) of the game.

@aggsyb - why would you even bother making any comment?  I mean, really, what are you getting out of saying anything?  Perhaps a feeling of superiority.  Does picking on a Newbie (I know it was only a soft put-down but hardly constructive) make you feel better about yourself?

As Dom has pointed out and has no doubt tried to nurture, this forum is mostly free of the acerbic comments that plague other forums.  If I was making a strategic point that was erroneous, I would welcome constructive feedback.  However, as I have said (and perhaps am guilty of not being clear enough in my original message), I was trying to empathise and share (and, in some way, exorcise) my own frustrations.  There, it would seem I have done so again and perhaps you will find a way to do the same without belittling someone else's comments.
Rickaby

Back to the original topic of this thread - how many times can a friggin' 10% dog suck out on the river?  One out of ten, right?  WRONG?  I swear, the amount of times I watch the percentages (on William Hill, for those who don't play there, they are displayed for all-ins) of my opponent fall to (say) 7%, only to see them jump to 100% when they river a gut-shot or a set; it's gotta be more than one out of ten.  It's actually happened to finish off my last 2 games (1 gutter, 1 set) which is why I'm here, venting my spleen.

I know (well, at least I hope) it's all a matter of perception and that probabilities will (should) even-out over time.  And, when I've had a good run, I feel like I can take on the world.  Presently, though, I feel like the poker gods (miserable SOBs) have it in for me.

I also know I'm far from a good player (saves anyone having to waste their precious time pointing this out to me) but to work my way to a 2:1 or 3:1 chip lead and have that smashed to smithereens when I get it in as healthy favourite, is extremely dispiriting.  I've now got to the point of expecting to see villain's 2-outer appear on the river.

Just as there are stages of grief, I think there are stages of tilt and tilt-management.  Whatever they are, I've moved through logic (telling myself, "Poker is a game of probabilities and it stands to reason that even 1% dogs can win."), anger (I don't need to explain that one), bemusement ("Yeah, of course he sucked out, what a joke!"), anger (yep, back again), empathy (watching others suffer bad-beats and coming to posts like this to hear others' stories), anger, take-a-breakitis ("I need to get away before I go crazy and/or break something!"), over-playitis-1 ("My luck's gotta change and if I play enough........."), back-to-the-drawing-board, self-punishment, over-playitis-2 ("How am I going to get better if I don't play?"), anger, complaining (bitching in a forum)..............well, here I am.

Well, complaining hasn't helped so I might opt for take-a-break and back-to-the-drawing-board.

As Wall of Voodoo said, "...I remain on the far side of crazy"
hjbear

aggsyb wrote:
Rickaby wrote:
I get the concept of small-balling villain down to minimise the impact of suck-outs


I know dom wants me to contriube more posotively (sp) to the community but tbf i think ive contributed a decent amt and i feel this is just so hard to resist, you get a pass


such a troll Razz
kolonel

Rickaby wrote:
Back to the original topic of this thread - how many times can a friggin' 10% dog suck out on the river?  One out of ten, right?  WRONG?  I swear, the amount of times I watch the percentages (on William Hill, for those who don't play there, they are displayed for all-ins) of my opponent fall to (say) 7%, only to see them jump to 100% when they river a gut-shot or a set; it's gotta be more than one out of ten.  It's actually happened to finish off my last 2 games (1 gutter, 1 set) which is why I'm here, venting my spleen.


LOL, i look forward to the day when i have played that many games, that those moments of variance are merely a blip on the radar.  Keep at it mate, and gl.

Feel free to jump on for some sweats too.  Its always good to share a 1 outer hit every now and then Wink
aggsyb

Rickaby wrote:

@aggsyb - why would you even bother making any comment?  I mean, really, what are you getting out of saying anything?  Perhaps a feeling of superiority.  Does picking on a Newbie (I know it was only a soft put-down but hardly constructive) make you feel better about yourself?


Feeling infinatley better about myself about trolling. If I can only post constructive advice relentlessly over and over again, I would have quit this forum a long time ago.
Rickaby

kolonel wrote:
Rickaby wrote:
Back to the original topic of this thread - how many times can a friggin' 10% dog suck out on the river?  One out of ten, right?  WRONG?  I swear, the amount of times I watch the percentages (on William Hill, for those who don't play there, they are displayed for all-ins) of my opponent fall to (say) 7%, only to see them jump to 100% when they river a gut-shot or a set; it's gotta be more than one out of ten.  It's actually happened to finish off my last 2 games (1 gutter, 1 set) which is why I'm here, venting my spleen.


LOL, i look forward to the day when i have played that many games, that those moments of variance are merely a blip on the radar.  Keep at it mate, and gl.

Feel free to jump on for some sweats too.  Its always good to share a 1 outer hit every now and then Wink


I fear that when I've played that many games, I will be more like Phil Helmuth than the Dalai Lama.

I will definitely take you up on that sweat offer, though - not to share the experience of another bad beat (although I'm sure we could spend some time bemoaning our poor fortune) but to get some added input and advice.
Rickaby

aggsyb wrote:
Rickaby wrote:

@aggsyb - why would you even bother making any comment?  I mean, really, what are you getting out of saying anything?  Perhaps a feeling of superiority.  Does picking on a Newbie (I know it was only a soft put-down but hardly constructive) make you feel better about yourself?


Feeling infinatley better about myself about trolling. If I can only post constructive advice relentlessly over and over again, I would have quit this forum a long time ago.


Aaaah, the mist has cleared and I have a much clearer idea of your motivations and some minor insight into your personality.  As the Buddhists say, we are all suffering.  I guess we all have a different way of dealing with that.  Anyway, good luck with your way.
kolonel



LOL Laughing
kierkegaard1

Rickaby wrote:
Back to the original topic of this thread - how many times can a friggin' 10% dog suck out on the river?  One out of ten, right?  WRONG?  I swear, the amount of times I watch the percentages (on William Hill, for those who don't play there, they are displayed for all-ins) of my opponent fall to (say) 7%, only to see them jump to 100% when they river a gut-shot or a set; it's gotta be more than one out of ten.


actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times
kolonel

kierkegaard1 wrote:
actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times


level ??
kolonel

just when you thought it was safe to go back to the tables..........

BOOM - 2 outer
BOOM - 3 outer
BOOM - 2 outer



Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing
hjbear

kolonel wrote:
kierkegaard1 wrote:
actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times


level ??



plz tell me ur joking kolonel?
BetMagicMoney

hjbear wrote:
kolonel wrote:
kierkegaard1 wrote:
actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times


level ??



plz tell me ur joking kolonel?

level ??
Rickaby

kierkegaard1 wrote:
Rickaby wrote:
Back to the original topic of this thread - how many times can a friggin' 10% dog suck out on the river?  One out of ten, right?  WRONG?  I swear, the amount of times I watch the percentages (on William Hill, for those who don't play there, they are displayed for all-ins) of my opponent fall to (say) 7%, only to see them jump to 100% when they river a gut-shot or a set; it's gotta be more than one out of ten.


actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times


Yeah, I must've missed that lecture during my Maths Science degree.  I was probably at a Philosophy lecture, bending my mind around how perception can skew rationale - I know the maths but it just doesn't seem to ring true.

This post, itself, has been an interesting exercise in perception.  It would seem contexts have been mixed, points missed and emotions riding gutshot over logic.  I know I have been guilty of falling prey to the trolling efforts of he-who-shall-not be-referred-to-again.  Maybe this very response is a misinterpretation of kierkegaard's intent.  If it was subtle humour, then I have, yet again, missed the point.  If it was a genuine offer of help, I thank you and assure you that this level of maths is not beyond me.  The help I need is psychological - the more I play the more crazy I get; more convinced that the maths is bogus and there really are poker gods that have it in for me.
kolonel

hjbear wrote:
kolonel wrote:
kierkegaard1 wrote:
actually it's not. 10% will win exactly 1 in 10 times


level ??



plz tell me ur joking kolonel?


what do you think  Rolling Eyes
kolonel

STRIKES AGAIN !!!!

Poker Stars $3.29+$0.21 No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t25/t50 Blinds - 2 players - View hand 1452938
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

Hero (BTN/SB): t1420 28.40 BBs
BB: t1580 31.60 BBs

Pre Flop: (t75) Hero is BTN/SB with 6 6
Hero raises to t100, BB calls t50

Flop: (t200) 6 2 T (2 players)
BB bets t50, Hero calls t50

Turn: (t300) 5 (2 players)
BB bets t50, Hero raises to t150, BB raises to t250, Hero raises to t1270 all in, BB calls t1020

River: (t2840) T (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: t2840
Hero shows 6 6 (a full house, Sixes full of Tens)
BB shows 5 T (a full house, Tens full of Fives)
BB wins t2840
kolonel

NEXT GAME !!!!

Poker Stars $3.29+$0.21 No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t30/t60 Blinds - 2 players - View hand 1452949
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

Hero (BB): t1444 24.07 BBs
BTN/SB: t1556 25.93 BBs

Pre Flop: (t90) Hero is BB with J A
BTN/SB raises to t120, Hero raises to t1444 all in, BTN/SB calls t1324

Flop: (t2888) Q 8 6 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Turn: (t2888) 7 (2 players - 1 is all in)

River: (t2888) 5 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: t2888
Hero shows J A (high card Ace)
BTN/SB shows K 9 (a straight, Five to Nine)
BTN/SB wins t2888


Can someone tell me when the % start to come my way  Laughing
BetMagicMoney

hand 1 raise bigger on the turn

hand 2 yer i get that alot!
Rickaby

kolonel wrote:
STRIKES AGAIN !!!!


In the words of Phil Helmuth, "That's just sick!!"  Actually, speaking of PH, I seem to remember him in a WSOPME hand where some guy called his PFR with T3o.  The hand then proceeded much the same as yours.  You can imagine the berating this "poor" numbskull copped.

So, your villain calls as a 30% dog (don't know the match dynamics but I can't imagine too many recommending calling with T5o OOP).  Then, on the flop, he drops to 3% dog but would probably think he's got the best hand.  He must have felt pretty good getting it in on the turn and then sick when he saw your cards, being the 4.5% dog.

Tell me, kolonel, were you sitting there saying, "Not a 10, not a 10!"  And then when it came, did you laugh, cry, scream, smash something or drop into a catatonic stupor from which you've only just recovered?
Rickaby

kolonel wrote:
Can someone tell me when the % start to come my way


Mate, with your history, I reckon you could give the game away (giving you the probability of not losing as 100%), only to see your BR withdrawal disappear into the ether.
kolonel

Rickaby wrote:
kolonel wrote:
Can someone tell me when the % start to come my way


Mate, with your history, I reckon you could give the game away (giving you the probability of not losing as 100%), only to see your BR withdrawal disappear into the ether.


LOL, has been on the cards many a time.

As another wise sage once said "find another fkn hobby"   Shocked

Hopefully, one day down the track will look at this thread/s and laugh.
       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Brags - Beats & Variance
Page 1 of 1