| Archive for Tagpoker Forum A friendly place for winning poker players to share their strategy to making money playing poker. |
| hjbear |
playing the 10si am now rolled to play the $10 husng but i am on stars. i do like stars. but is it worth the move to full tilt just for the rakeback? |
||
| The Angler |
The rake at Full Tilt for the 10s is $0.5 - at 250 games a months that's $33.75 per month rakeback.
Although I'm going to switch to Poker Stars when I hit the 10s as I can't get any rakeback from Full Tilt at all. |
||
| butitwassooted |
Unless you are from the US and/or play midstakes+, you can get FAR better rewards by playing on Euro networks. And no, <40% rb is not not good. | ||
| Shove |
Where on the Euro networks I can get > 25 % rb and games opening at less than 2minutes at the 33s/55s? I think you have no real alternative to Stars/FTP then, right? | ||
| Gunnar |
play on 2-3 networks at the same time and you will get the traffic you need!
i did so as a ringgame palyer and this worked just fine for me. |
||
| BetMagicMoney |
only way to get action that fast is stars or fulltilt tbh |
||
| U Cook Socks |
You can't get a game on Full Tilt at the $30s and $50s within two minutes on a regular basis, and although slightly quicker, you can't on stars either. They are obviously have the highest traffic though, so yes if you are playing those stakes, may as well choose one of those, and if volume is your main aim, Stars is best, as at certain times of day , Full Tilt is dead. |
||
| owzthat |
I think FTP is going to be your best bet. rakeback and good action. Stars is prob better once your playing higher with more volume. |