Archive for Tagpoker Forum A friendly place for winning poker players to share their strategy to making money playing poker.
 


       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Bankroll Building (All Members)
blsmur

NEW START for AussieKiss11 at Will HILL

Hi Guys
i have been a member for quite while and when i first started on Tagpoker I was looking to improve my Heads Up Game for playing 9 man sitngos

I have been playing poker for 5 years  NOW AND NEVER HAD MORE THAN $1000 in My BankRoll with $20 buyins  only
i did some training on  DeepStacks university  and i lost my $1000  that i had built up

I then went to Drag the Bar where I tried everything they teach and eventually ended up here

The result of all this training and study was a belief that I knew everything there was to know about poker

BUT

I still couldn't win and what is worse  I put in bigger deposits upto $100 a time because i was being told that this is the way  
and then when  "BlackFriday" happenned  most of my then mates that played were gone
so i just played less and less

Recently Broker advertised his new deal on Will Hill poker So I signed up


and nothing changed in the way I was playing  

Then I got a call from Jakester to play me
when i started I against him i thought he was pretty easy to beat   and then he wanted to go turbo
and he had me by the short an curlies

so I was thinking he just getting lucky at the time but now i think I was playing badly

so i start at will hill with $35  
and i had $20 in pokerstars account

i have some other accounts but dont use them much at all

now Last night i was listening to some Jarrod Tendlar Audio tapes
and the interesting thing he points out  "we cant reasonably expect to win every game we play "

"if we are to become rich from poker we must use sensible money management "

I think I have been to a point
but he said if we $5000 tourny for instance we should not enter $5000 buyin tourny  and expect ti win it too"

there 4 of these tapes i got for free from a subscription to some pokersite

But I had an epiphany from those tapes

and i have played 9man sitngos and win  
and the only husngo i lose  I had AK against his AQ  very early in the game we both all in preflop
and he flops Q
so game over
other than that I havnt lost
so i will come back and tell how I am going in a week  if you interested
thanks for Looking

Ron
ps ; on pokerstars I am blsmur i play at both sites
doodiewiz

Best of luck mate! Also on William Hill, but haven't played there much. Thinking I might play the hypers at the micros with a $100 BR. Maybe we could play a few but the with the timezones it might be difficult. GL GL!
blsmur

doodiewiz wrote:
Best of luck mate! Also on William Hill, but haven't played there much. Thinking I might play the hypers at the micros with a $100 BR. Maybe we could play a few but the with the timezones it might be difficult. GL GL!


Hey i love to play you
i am playing the micros on there
and sometimes i play the turbos

so say hello  and if you like we can discuss play after on skype
doodiewiz

cool! I'll add you and give u a shout if I see u online or vice versa. Maybe play best of 3 or first to 3? We can play $1s if u like. Then swap HHs..
blsmur

Just a report in
my Bankroll Build sux

i should rename it  to Bankroll  loose

well I have made some progress this evening and last  evening as well

but just through a game to river shove with top pair

dumb i know

someone should come and tell how dumb so I dont do it again
Thanks

my read on this guy dead tight

he won nearly everyhand we played


i won all the others
ie  he folded

when i called him down just to see if i was good
i was out carded by 1  eg if i had a 9 he had a ten etc

but my call on his river allin was a bit tilty i think

still i am up for today
but way below my starting stack of $35
blsmur

oh god I did it again


this guy was pretty aggressive


any way i have KQ off pre  in the SB  with59 bb

he has 92 bb in the bb


I raise min raise to 40
he calls

flop 6h Kd 8h

he cks

i bet half pot 40

he flats  turn 5s


i bet 120 into a 160 pot


he shoves

so my call was bad

but he was betting everything every pot
and I got caught up in it  i guess

he showed 65 off


for 2 pair

i am so pissed with myself for  even letting it get to me

this has to one of my biggest failings
i just have to be in tip top brain function not to get done this way

any one got a suggestion
YATHINNK

It's as simple as not doing it. It might be hard for you not to make the call or let hands go when you know you're beat but just by adjusting your game so that you take more care and not tilt call etc. Make a mental note of some of the things they do and then try and use it against them, it's that easy a lot of the time.

Obviously it isn't ACTUALLY that easy as there's a lot of variables and the inevitable downswings, suckouts and tilt that can get to a player. So making sure that you know what you're doing, why you're calling and what you intend to do on further streets is a huge advantage. You said in your post you're angry at yourself for doing it so you must have known or had some inkling that you were behind, so take that, learn from it and understand that you are oftentimes going to be right if something doesn't seem right about the play that they are making.
blsmur

I know from game theory that weak hands can grow in strength by turn or river

there are now 3 games i lose

the game where i have 2 pair on flop I think was bad luck for me because he had Kj and hit the J on river  and i had K9 and flop 2 pair

so I was playing correctly there and he made a mistake ( i m o )


how ever the
last 2 games
i am expecting villian to have high cards

and not be calling with 2 4  in one game and 56 in another

i will be more wary  from now on  I was very tired last night and i am sure this doesnt help

thanks for your input
doodiewiz

Hey! You know we just played right on will hill? I'm sunshineBillWrigly. I said hello in chat and said i was from tagpoker, but i don't know if you had chat on or not.

Anyway if you want to talk about your/my game send me a PM or chat here. I had you classified as loose agressive. You kept opening randomly to 5x and spite raising me when I limped it seemed like to me, but you did some good stuff too like stabbing lots of flops. I wasn't sure if you were a bit tilted though. Anyway GG mate!
blsmur

doodiewiz wrote:
Hey! You know we just played right on will hill? I'm sunshineBillWrigly. I said hello in chat and said i was from tagpoker, but i don't know if you had chat on or not.

Anyway if you want to talk about your/my game send me a PM or chat here. I had you classified as loose agressive. You kept opening randomly to 5x and spite raising me when I limped it seemed like to me, but you did some good stuff too like stabbing lots of flops. I wasn't sure if you were a bit tilted though. Anyway GG mate!



Sorry I didnt  see your chat  
I dont usually have it on

interesting that you think i was being aggressive

and loose
I am going to watch that game and see what I think

i will post my thought in here

skype me on blsmur   anytime
blsmur

ok i was loose and aggressive


i am posting a vid of the game from my perspective


i go on to say i think your play is weak

I am sorry for saying this as in hind sight  you trapped me with  the AA
so well done

yes i am aggressive  and  probably a bit loose

I had no idea you had AA
so i was ignoring the signs which  when you 3bet me i should have taken some notice
you will see i am willing to bet most hands

just need to learn when to give up

Broker talks about this type of player in his course (lol its me )  

so well done to you
Thanks for letting me know it was you

regards Ron
http://www.viddler.com/explore/blsmur/videos/2/
AxeMage

hey blsmur, saw the vid

i think playing a little looser is fine and c-betting a little more is okay vs him because he seemed on the tigher side, but i think you need to pay a little more attention and react to how HE plays... he seemed pretty Taggish and played hands when he had them or called with draws... i didn't think you needed to make as many of the looser calls u did, or tried to scare him off hands when he's already shown aggression (like when you had 3h5h and he bet the turn when he hit the J)... it would have been better to try and show it down when you had second last pair... not worth overplaying your cards in that spot when the pot's already that big...

you should try to stick to your initial reads and keep playing the right game for the appropriate player type until he gives you reason not to, by changing his style (a drastic frequency change... not just a 1 ranodom shove that's confusing)...

anyhow, i'll see you around and we'll play some games again, tty soon!
doodiewiz

That's alright mate. No worries and its good to be honest. Nice one for making a vid and look forward to checking the video out later and I'll post my thoughts. Bear in mind I was adapting to your play and just decided to play ABC poker against you. No need to play back. You called all my cbets, so I just started betting for value!
blsmur

doodiewiz wrote:
That's alright mate. Good to be honest. Nice one for making a vid and look forward to checking the video out later and I'll post my thoughts. Bear in mind I was adapting to your play and just decided to play ABC poker against you. No need to play back. You called all my cbets, so I just started betting for value!



yeah i was thinking when i watch the replay you just doing what Broker says

so i am a bit dumb

I used to just limp like  broker says and that  just doesnt make any money  because i wont call down  big bets with real weak hands

so I just dont understand what broker is teaching

seems like i dont have a bloody clue  when it come to HU poker

I failed to get a read on you
and most players I play

unless they very obviously a call stn or a super lag

everyone in the middle i dont seem to get

so i dont know where i go from here
i have nearly finished 300 games on will hill and i about broke on will hill


I have been very busy building foaling alarms last 4 weeks its been 7 days a week  so I guess that is not helping much as it very tiring
the money is good though

Very Happy


I am now playing worse than I ever did when i first started this course

i was actually able to make a profit on fulltilt at this level;
doodiewiz

Don't worry about it mate. They're not the easiest concepts to get a decent grasp of. It took me 400 games before I started beating the $2 level. I'd just think of this $2 level as your HU training. Once you can bet this level you'll realise you play a lot of the same players at the next couple of levels. Small ball isn't about calling down with bottom pair it's about playing lots postflop, grinding your oppoent down, playing small pots and picking up on reads IMO and maybe calling down 2nd/3rd pair if your reads justify it. Also its Good for when your learning i find because you get lots of postflop Practice in. Anyway will post more soon as I get a chance. I'll send you my HH also..BTW axemage gave good advice I thought. You did get some reads u said I was weak, a bit passive maybe, so you were stabbing lots of pots. That was good!
kierkegaard1

i'll play you blsmur and you can make a vid?
Brokerstar

Ok I'm going to address a few things here because you keep saying or insinuating that my course is the reason that you are not winning at poker which I'll be honest is frustrating for me as well as it must be you.

The course is not a magic pill that you watch, don't really pay attention to and then print money like a rock star. Sadly it doesn't work that way.

You do actually have to pay attention to the video's, lesson and pay attention when you are actually in a match.

A lot of what you're saying just say's to me that you are not paying attention when you're in a match rather than have an incorrect strategy.

I just don't think it's possible for me to put the study material in my videos any more straight forwardly than I do.

Think about what you're saying in your last post.



blsmur wrote:



I used to just limp like  broker says and that  just doesnt make any money  because i wont call down  big bets with real weak hands



I don't really get what you're saying here? What does this even mean?


blsmur wrote:


so I just dont understand what broker is teaching


I'm teaching how to spot player types.
how to adjust to them.
when to bet.
when to bluff.
when to adjust.
what it looks like when they adjust.
what raise and bet sizes to make with different hand strengths.
how to adjust pre flop for differing opponents and stack sizes.
playing later streets.
playing in position.
out of position.
deep stacked.
short stacked.
end game.
playing draws for different players.
bluffing.
semi bluffing.
optimal bluff sizing for maximum profitability.
With what and why I limp vs calling stations and how to build huge pots .
With what and why I limp vs LAG's and how to build huge pots .
With what and why I limp vs nits and how I switch it up later.
Vs TAG/ thinking players I don't limp anywhere near as much and cover why.
plus so much more but that's the crucks of the lessons



blsmur wrote:

i go on to say i think your play is weak



blsmur wrote:


I had no idea you had AA
so i was ignoring the signs which  when you 3bet me i should have taken some notice
you will see i am willing to bet most hands




Ok here you say that he plays weak. He actually does play fairly tightly.

So from the course what do I say, in the videos when a tight player or a passive player comes to life and starts really showing aggression? either pre flop with re raises, post flop with check raises or re raises etc?

I say this is a strong hand so often that you can make some biggish folds.

Or if you thought a guy was playing tight and/ or weak why would you go crazy with second bottom pair? Where in the course does it say go crazy with second bottom pair vs a tight/ weak player?

All I can do is give you the strategy advice, I can't sit on your shoulder and make you actually do it if you decide that you have 'better ideas'.


blsmur wrote:

I am now playing worse than I ever did when i first started this course



In what respect?

How are you playing worse, tell me what has changed in your game that used to work so well for you before?

Were you better at reading players styles before? playing post flop?

I really want to know how you think you're playing worse?

I just don't get it but would like to help Very Happy

I've offered to do a game review video with you where we will do dual commentary so do feel free to take me up on it.

I've also asked what specific questions it is that you 'can't seem to find the answer to' so I or anyone else here can help you but I haven't seen them yet.

Don't take this post as anything other than firm but fair. I was the same with BMM about a year ago and he's since come of leaps and bounds in that time.

I'm on your side but your posts come over as you're looking for a scape goat and an excuse as opposed to taking accountability for not studying the strategy that's laid out.

If you can give me a tangible reason why you didn't believe a" tight or weak player" didn't have a strong hand when you were re raised with AA and what strategy guide you got the logic from to play the hand in the way you did then it's more likely that is to blame for you losing money as opposed to the course that I have put together.
blsmur

kierkegaard1 wrote:
i'll play you blsmur and you can make a vid?



oh that is so cool thankyou

but i omly got 10 bux in my account   I will have to upload some i guess it will be worth the lesson  

so how much is this game going to be for
blsmur

Brokerstar wrote:
Ok I'm going to address a few things here because you keep saying or insinuating that my course is the reason that you are not winning at poker which I'll be honest is frustrating for me as well as it must be you.

The course is not a magic pill that you watch, don't really pay attention to and then print money like a rock star. Sadly it doesn't work that way.

You do actually have to pay attention to the video's, lesson and pay attention when you are actually in a match.

A lot of what you're saying just say's to me that you are not paying attention when you're in a match rather than have an incorrect strategy.

I just don't think it's possible for me to put the study material in my videos any more straight forwardly than I do.

Think about what you're saying in your last post.



blsmur wrote:



I used to just limp like  broker says and that  just doesnt make any money  because i wont call down  big bets with real weak hands



I don't really get what you're saying here? What does this even mean?


blsmur wrote:


so I just dont understand what broker is teaching


I'm teaching how to spot player types.
how to adjust to them.
when to bet.
when to bluff.
when to adjust.
what it looks like when they adjust.
what raise and bet sizes to make with different hand strengths.
how to adjust pre flop for differing opponents and stack sizes.
playing later streets.
playing in position.
out of position.
deep stacked.
short stacked.
end game.
playing draws for different players.
bluffing.
semi bluffing.
optimal bluff sizing for maximum profitability.
With what and why I limp vs calling stations and how to build huge pots .
With what and why I limp vs LAG's and how to build huge pots .
With what and why I limp vs nits and how I switch it up later.
Vs TAG/ thinking players I don't limp anywhere near as much and cover why.
plus so much more but that's the crucks of the lessons



blsmur wrote:

i go on to say i think your play is weak



blsmur wrote:


I had no idea you had AA
so i was ignoring the signs which  when you 3bet me i should have taken some notice
you will see i am willing to bet most hands




Ok here you say that he plays weak. He actually does play fairly tightly.

So from the course what do I say, in the videos when a tight player or a passive player comes to life and starts really showing aggression? either pre flop with re raises, post flop with check raises or re raises etc?

I say this is a strong hand so often that you can make some biggish folds.

Or if you thought a guy was playing tight and/ or weak why would you go crazy with second bottom pair? Where in the course does it say go crazy with second bottom pair vs a tight/ weak player?

All I can do is give you the strategy advice, I can't sit on your shoulder and make you actually do it if you decide that you have 'better ideas'.


blsmur wrote:

I am now playing worse than I ever did when i first started this course



In what respect?

How are you playing worse, tell me what has changed in your game that used to work so well for you before?

Were you better at reading players styles before? playing post flop?

I really want to know how you think you're playing worse?

I just don't get it but would like to help Very Happy

I've offered to do a game review video with you where we will do dual commentary so do feel free to take me up on it.

I've also asked what specific questions it is that you 'can't seem to find the answer to' so I or anyone else here can help you but I haven't seen them yet.

Don't take this post as anything other than firm but fair. I was the same with BMM about a year ago and he's since come of leaps and bounds in that time.

I'm on your side but your posts come over as you're looking for a scape goat and an excuse as opposed to taking accountability for not studying the strategy that's laid out.

If you can give me a tangible reason why you didn't believe a" tight or weak player" didn't have a strong hand when you were re raised with AA and what strategy guide you got the logic from to play the hand in the way you did then it's more likely that is to blame for you losing money as opposed to the course that I have put together.



Dom what you say is right

no its not your fault  

yes i will take you up on the video review offer  
i still have a few games to make the 300


A lot of my problem at the moment is due to being worn out  from my workload

last night i have Qx  and the board  KJKTQ and i called over half my stack

he shows AA

so I will try and get some extra rest  we have caught up with the workload  and  while the money is nice  i have been walking around like a zombie  lately


I didnt meant to cast dispersions on your course it is great

but i would have liked a follow up  review of whether i am understanding every thing


and in my case   i think some sweats or perhaps  tests of what i had learnt

what you could see i was understanding and what i wasnt  

so  i guess follow through  on the course  is  what  i was looking for


that little quiz on your webpage what would i do in this situation etc

when i first did that i got about 40%

i got better at it  but then i started to know the question off by heart


any way with your review and getting to play kierke

life will be interesting

i bet we get some railbird s

might be good to set it up on tags poker site on stars


i leave up to you guys to sort that out
hope he doesnt want to play too high stakes  too much money


i will take the day off before we play and try to on the ball

regards Ron
blsmur

axmage i think you make some good points

perhaps when we next hook up we can review that game together
see what i could have done different
blsmur

Hey Broker

if i ever get a graph  like  the ones on your site  

you will have reason to be very proud
AxeMage

sure, no problem blsmur, just msg me on here or on skype when you see me and we'll look over some more games... just let me know when ur work load eases up and you're free
blsmur

this is just a reply to your what your teaching and is my perception of where I am at
now i have been with you for 7 mths  ani have failed to grasp all of this and i have failed to implement it



I'm teaching how to spot player types.

i am spotting them sometimes

how to adjust to them.
if i recognise them  i adjust sometimes

when to bet. think
i got the betting ok
when to bluff.
think i bluffing ok

when to adjust.
not adjusting properly if at all

what it looks like when they adjust.
  no idea

what raise and bet sizes to make with different hand strengths.
some idea

how to adjust pre flop for differing opponents and stack sizes
. getting better at it


playing later streets.
 good when i got the best hand but i probably push players out  i have tried different size bets on river depending on what i am trying to do eg  
monkey spazz bet inducing
or shove to look like a bluff etc


playing in position.    i think i do ok  here

out of position. definately not my strong point

deep stacked.  not my best  game


short stacked.
better at short stack play

end game.
i know /nash etc and now chubakov

playing draws for different players.
weak at this

bluffing. bluffing
pretty good I think

semi bluffing.  
i over do semi bluffs and often stack off  on draws

optimal bluff sizing for maximum profitability.  

some of my bluffs are just perfect  

With what and why I limp vs calling stations and how to build huge pots .

i have problem adjusting properly to call stns  and still try to bluff them

With what and why I limp vs LAG's and how to build huge pots .

getting better verus lags

With what and why I limp vs nits and how I switch it up later.

well not great i  over bluff these guys and they catch me out

Vs TAG/ thinking players I don't limp anywhere near as much and cover
why

versus tags  i play pretty carefully  and sometime i fold enough or correctly  .
plus so much more but that's the crucks of the lessons


i hope responses help  you help me

Ron









So from the course what do I say, in the videos when a tight player or a passive player comes to life and starts really showing aggression? either pre flop with re raises, post flop with check raises or re raises etc?

I say this is a strong hand so often that you can make some biggish folds.

sometimes i do make these folds  

Or if you thought a guy was playing tight and/ or weak why would you go crazy with second bottom pair? Where in the course does it say go crazy with second bottom pair vs a tight/ weak player?

obviously get this wrong a fair bit


All I can do is give you the strategy advice, I can't sit on your shoulder and make you actually do it if you decide that you have 'better ideas'.

I dont mean to have better ideas but failing to recognize the situation i might be reverting to a previous way of playing  or i miss read the situation completely



blsmur wrote:

I am now playing worse than I ever did when i first started this course



In what respect? i am losing  more than i ever did  i dont know why  
i was making a profit  be it small on fulltilt


How are you playing worse, tell me what has changed in your game that used to work so well for you before?  I dont know

Were you better at reading players styles before? playing post flop? I dont know


I really want to know how you think you're playing worse?the dollars can prove it   i was playing about 60% wins now i just below 50%

I just don't get it but would like to help Very Happy   i would love the help


I've offered to do a game review video with you where we will do dual commentary so do feel free to take me up on it.

yep that will be great


I've also asked what specific questions it is that you 'can't seem to find the answer to' so I or anyone else here can help you but I haven't seen them yet.
possibly in the my answers above

Don't take this post as anything other than firm but fair. I was the same with BMM about a year ago and he's since come of leaps and bounds in that time.
well great to hear glad for BMM


I'm on your side but your posts come over as you're looking for a scape goat and an excuse as opposed to taking accountability for not studying the strategy that's laid out.

no I am not other than i couldnt get the extra coaching or help i needed

If you can give me a tangible reason why you didn't believe a" tight or weak player" didn't have a strong hand when you were re raised with AA and what strategy guide you got the logic from to play the hand in the way you did then it's more likely that is to blame for you losing money as opposed to the course that I have put together.

the only logical reason was i not realise he got the best hand  

[/quote]
U Cook Socks

This thread is beyond ridiculous.
sandman369

Blazing_Saddler wrote:
This thread is beyond ridiculous.


+1
blsmur

sandman369 wrote:
Blazing_Saddler wrote:
This thread is beyond ridiculous.


+1



whether this thread is ridiculous or not

there are 2 things happening here


i am still a losing player  for what ever reason

and I am trying to sort out why

both Broker and kierke  are offering extra help for me



why is this ridiculous

perhaps my answers above may seem ridiculous to you   and maybe not to others


but above all   someone is trying to help me


so i don't believe it is ridiculous at all

what is  amazing I am now getting the offer of help for free when i couldnt  buy it in the past

so I am impressed
and pleased to say the least
U Cook Socks

Okay, entertaining might have been a better word than ridiculous.

Fwiw, the offer of help has always been there if you look back through your threads. It wont be of any help until you start listening, and applying some of it to your game. Simple as that.

I have no grudge with you, despite what you think, but I have read some of the things you have been advised, and I have watched your videos, and you clearly aren't taking in what you are being told.

There is no point me saying you are doing okay, when you are clearly not. Personally I think you should go through Brokers videos again, watch some of the videos off the site, and try and see how he tries to use his theory's and take in his thought processes. Then try and build your game from scratch , bit by bit.

Then you have the offer of help from Kierk, and BrokerStar, use those wisely too, and you may see some progress.
kierkegaard1

blsmur wrote:
kierkegaard1 wrote:
i'll play you blsmur and you can make a vid?



oh that is so cool thankyou

but i omly got 10 bux in my account   I will have to upload some i guess it will be worth the lesson  

so how much is this game going to be for


$2? i dont really care
doodiewiz

I always enjoy blsumrs threads! This has been beneficial to me too. Didn't realise how passive I was being. Good/bad against him? Funny my memory of the game was a lot different as I never review games...I think u were doing ok till you just spewed/called your stack off. Also not a fan of the 4x/5x raises preflop unless it's against a call station I guess with good hands. By the way you were ahead when you called the 3bet with 82os lol. Don't play irrationally! GL!
blsmur

Blazing_Saddler wrote:
Okay, entertaining might have been a better word than ridiculous.

Fwiw, the offer of help has always been there if you look back through your threads. It wont be of any help until you start listening, and applying some of it to your game. Simple as that.

I have no grudge with you, despite what you think, but I have read some of the things you have been advised, and I have watched your videos, and you clearly aren't taking in what you are being told.

There is no point me saying you are doing okay, when you are clearly not. Personally I think you should go through Brokers videos again, watch some of the videos off the site, and try and see how he tries to use his theory's and take in his thought processes. Then try and build your game from scratch , bit by bit.

Then you have the offer of help from Kierk, and BrokerStar, use those wisely too, and you may see some progress.



yes mate fair comment

i am aware i havnt been understanding enough  

and i do try  to  

so onwards and upwards

I  was always a slow learner    ( my teachers at school would lose interest in teaching me  cos the others were picking it up quicker )


but  I will keep at it  

I need to be able to play husngs well even if it only at the $2 level

but at 50% winrate is no where good enough
U Cook Socks

blsmur wrote:
Blazing_Saddler wrote:
Okay, entertaining might have been a better word than ridiculous.

Fwiw, the offer of help has always been there if you look back through your threads. It wont be of any help until you start listening, and applying some of it to your game. Simple as that.

I have no grudge with you, despite what you think, but I have read some of the things you have been advised, and I have watched your videos, and you clearly aren't taking in what you are being told.

There is no point me saying you are doing okay, when you are clearly not. Personally I think you should go through Brokers videos again, watch some of the videos off the site, and try and see how he tries to use his theory's and take in his thought processes. Then try and build your game from scratch , bit by bit.

Then you have the offer of help from Kierk, and BrokerStar, use those wisely too, and you may see some progress.



yes mate fair comment

i am aware i havnt been understanding enough  

and i do try  to  

so onwards and upwards

I  was always a slow learner    ( my teachers at school would lose interest in teaching me  cos the others were picking it up quicker )


but  I will keep at it  

I need to be able to play husngs well even if it only at the $2 level

but at 50% winrate is no where good enough


I was no good at school either mate, i'm not a quick learner either, I think the attribute that I have to compensate is that I try so hard at everything I do.

Very honest of you to post that though.

Take up the help that is on offer, and try and put a solid game together piece by piece.

In my opinion, you can beat the micros by just learning to value bet well, and be able to fold to aggression v passive players. Obviously there is more to poker than that, but it's a good starting point, that most players at the $2 games can't do.

If you have any questions about hands, and so on, then feel free to ask and I'll happily try and help.
kolonel

Hey blsmur, how do you compile your notes from the Broker course ?

Where do you keep them when playing ?  

Do you have cliff notes (condensed notes) ?

What sort of opening ranges vs diff opponent types do you consider ?

LAG
TAG
LP
TP

How do you play AK against a Calling Station when you miss ?

These are just examples of questions that you want to have the answer before considering starting up a table.

All this is covered in Brokers course and is there for you to go over.

Good luck with it all.
Brokerstar

blsmur wrote:


I'm teaching how to spot player types.

i am spotting them sometimes


This Video Should Help

blsmur wrote:

how to adjust to them.
if i recognise them  i adjust sometimes



Why only sometimes? If you spot a clear player type then why not use one of the counter strategies taught, every time?



blsmur wrote:


when to bluff.
think i bluffing ok



You mentioned that you like to keep bluffing call stations which although there are still spots you can get folds for the most part this is not a great idea. So bluffing isn't just the ability to click the bet button, it's knowing exactly when is good to do it and who is good to do it against.

blsmur wrote:

when to adjust.
not adjusting properly if at all


You just said you adjust sometimes????

blsmur wrote:


what it looks like when they adjust.
  no idea

When a tight player folds all the time then you see them random show down a very weak hand that may be an indicator that they are 'adjusting' or loosening up.

That is just one very simplistic example.

blsmur wrote:


what raise and bet sizes to make with different hand strengths.
some idea



Why only some idea? I don't know what else I can tell you? for each player type I cover my bet sizes both pre and post flop with all the hands that I'm playing. I also talk about why.

Just re watch the video and actually try writing down everything that I am saying.

Seriously, put pen to paper because just watching the videos isn't working for you, you need to work harder clearly so do that. Write down everything I say and then come back and tell me you don't know how to play mid pair, OOP vs a loose passive player (just for example)

blsmur wrote:


playing later streets.
 good when i got the best hand but i probably push players out  i have tried different size bets on river depending on what i am trying to do eg  
monkey spazz bet inducing
or shove to look like a bluff etc


It's easy to be good when we have the best hand although you'll be amazed at how many people still get that wrong.

Here's a question and I want you to really think about it before answering, really think about.

You are playing a super tight/ passive opponent. He's check folded nearly every flop and check/ called a couple of times and show down some medium strength hands.

You raise pre flop with J9s and the flop comes 2,T,J. The pot is say 120.

You c bet just over (70) half the pot and the guy check raises to 220 chips.

Do you.

a) Go all in  b) re raise small or c) something else

If for some reason you do pick c) then please elaborate on what and more importantly why.

blsmur wrote:


some of my bluffs are just perfect  



If you bluff all the time then sooner or later some will have been 'perfect'

try and think about what opponent you're targeting with you bluffs, what range of hands he's representing (combination of his actions and board texture) and then understand if future cards help you apply pressure to the range of hands that it looks like he could have (his range).


blsmur wrote:


i have problem adjusting properly to call stns  and still try to bluff them



I kind of covered this a couple of time.

blsmur wrote:


Or if you thought a guy was playing tight and/ or weak why would you go crazy with second bottom pair? Where in the course does it say go crazy with second bottom pair vs a tight/ weak player?

obviously get this wrong a fair bit



But why do you? That is the question, why?

For every move you make in poker you should have a sound, logical reason for your action.

Where did you get the game plan to go ape with second bottom pair when a tight player shows strength?

I'm not digging you out, just trying to get to the root of your problems.



You also said you're struggling to adjust to the 'hybrid players' so I have specially made a video just for you and anyone else out there that finds this hard.

It covers how I think when breaking down a players game even further than just trying to put them in a stereotypical box.

The email will be coming out later with the video link as soon as it has finished rendering.

Broker
kolonel

blsmur

I send Broker a long message in skype last night  after getting my will hill account down to $2

the last few games i lost i was like flop 2 pair and be allin only to lose on the river  "as usual"

so I was quite disheartened  to say the least

and for the first time in my life .I had actually started to think i should consider giving up poker  .

So I left computer and joined my family watching part 3 of Lord of the rings

and then went to bed

I wake up this morning about 6 am  ( this happens when you get to 60 I know it sux but that is life)

so I make myself a Milo and  go back to bed  but cant sleep
I am thinking about when i was making a profit before I decided to do any poker school  

How did I play then what was I trying to achieve  by going to a poker school

what is there from then  that I could apply to now  

when i used to make a final table in tournament  if i got to top 3 I was  or 3rd no seconds
and then after the schooling on Deep Stack university  I made some seconds




[img]
[/img]

but mostly i just lost all my money it seems that everything I learned did me no good

i stopped poker for a while and began to play on facebook  farmville and stuff
but it got boring

then i came across and ad for a poker book "treat your poker like a business"  this was july last year  
So I read this book and decide to start back at poker in earnest

and I join Drag the bar  website  because that book had links to it .

after about 4 months on Drag the bar I was learning heaps of stuff and putting more money into my pokerstars account than "I ever had

but still losing  overall

and getting frustrated by sukouts  and being outplayed and generally just getting it wrong

time to move on, i find an ad for Tag poker in 2+2

and decide that heads up play could help my 9 man sngo play  as i was playing a lot of them at the time and before Drag the bar i had a 24% ROI

it has been going down ever since

so here i am 7 months after joining Tag poker  and I am still the worst poker player ever


SO now today  I am thinking i need to play the way i did before I started any schooling
I was making a profit back then  
and my sng ROI was 24%  
now it down to 8% after getting educated

so  what did i do in those days
well i read books by good authors  that had made millions playing poker

and i was tight !   very tight

i could fold anything but AA unless i was 1 man from the bubble in a super satellite
in a normal tourny i would not fold AA or KK on bubble but QQ was folded

SO i think i was avoiding so much BS by folding, that most of the time i was winning stuff by good cards alone

but it was leaving me  wanting to play better

some of my rules of play from back then were

if the board pairs be real careful by all means stab at it but dont get too involved

the rule was if the flop came down wit 2 cards to a flush  be prepared to fold to aggression when the 3 rd cad came down or often i would just fold the on the flop just not get into the situation at all
now this is very tight play but it was stopping me from busting out of tournaments  
so with all the" knowledge " i get over the last year and half  I managed to never fold if 3 card to flush on the board
and i ignore paired boards because we all know that card removal means it less likely they have the 3 rd card


well i am adopting my old rules once more
and then i am applying a little stab on the flop when there is a paired board or a flush draw etc but that is it

if i get any action i might fold  or just call depending  on my read of opponent

now playing like this for just 2 games this morning led me to win both of them
and got me out of hands when i needed to be out

so i will try and continue with this thinking  

the other thing i noticed while playing the game  was I didnt need to get lucky  to win  on any of my all ins I just needed not to get unlucky  

lets hope i have found what is is i have been missing for all these months


Well thats enough of my  rambling  on
I hope my discovery can help someone else

regards Ron
i have about 60 game to go to finish my obligation to Broker for his last course offer on will hill

so
I will post my results what ever they may be
blsmur

hey 5 in a row  

good careful playing no unnecessary risks

there is hope for me yet


Smile
blsmur

Brokerstar wrote:
blsmur wrote:


I'm teaching how to spot player types.

i am spotting them sometimes


ok i think i am spotting ok now  

This Video Should Help

blsmur wrote:

how to adjust to them.
if i recognise them  i adjust sometimes


I wasnt adjusting  I thinkI was so off base it was not funny


Why only sometimes? If you spot a clear player type then why not use one of the counter strategies taught, every time?

against an aggro player today
i fold the weaks hands  and bet the strong   and call down with medium

last hand was  he shove  and i have 13bb i call with 66
he show
AK



blsmur wrote:


when to bluff.
think i bluffing ok



You mentioned that you like to keep bluffing call stations which although there are still spots you can get folds for the most part this is not a great idea. So bluffing isn't just the ability to click the bet button, it's knowing exactly when is good to do it and who is good to do it against.

blsmur wrote:


yeah i have fix the bluff thing ie not bluff to much  happy with bluffing overall I think i was thinking i could just outplay everyone
some sort of delusion


when to adjust.
not adjusting properly if at all


You just said you adjust sometimes????

blsmur wrote:


i am adjusting  but i still think i am not quite right there
I  know being results orientated is wrong    eg call in with 66 against an  AK  is 55/45  but chubakov and nash agree it right  at 13 bb

what it looks like when they adjust.
  no idea

When a tight player folds all the time then you see them random show down a very weak hand that may be an indicator that they are 'adjusting' or loosening up.

That is just one very simplistic example.

blsmur wrote:


yes i notice that in some players  

what raise and bet sizes to make with different hand strengths.
some idea



Why only some idea? I don't know what else I can tell you? for each player type I cover my bet sizes both pre and post flop with all the hands that I'm playing. I also talk about why.

i am doing ok here  I think but sometimes i seem to bet too much now  
and when the board got draws i tend to bet more but i have  them call 3/4 pot bets on flop and turn chasing a flush  and when they hit in the past i have called their all in  now I am folding  but it is hard  


Just re watch the video and actually try writing down everything that I am saying.

I have filled several notebooks with pages of writing  !! from watching your vids


Seriously, put pen to paper because just watching the videos isn't working for you, you need to work harder clearly so do that. Write down everything I say and then come back and tell me you don't know how to play mid pair, OOP vs a loose passive player (just for example)

blsmur wrote:


playing later streets.
 good when i got the best hand but i probably push players out  i have tried different size bets on river depending on what i am trying to do eg  
monkey spazz bet inducing
or shove to look like a bluff etc


It's easy to be good when we have the best hand although you'll be amazed at how many people still get that wrong.

Here's a question and I want you to really think about it before answering, really think about.

You are playing a super tight/ passive opponent. He's check folded nearly every flop and check/ called a couple of times and show down some medium strength hands.

You raise pre flop with J9s and the flop comes 2,T,J. The pot is say 120.

You c bet just over (70) half the pot and the guy check raises to 220 chips.

Do you.

a) Go all in  b) re raise small or c) something else

If for some reason you do pick c) then please elaborate on what and more importantly why.

blsmur wrote:


sometimes in the past i was  re raising  and possibly sometimes i was shoving  

but now I am thinking what beat meats me  22 jj tt  or more likely  depending on player type and over pair   so i am folding now  as i a dog to all those hands  


some of my bluffs are just perfect  



If you bluff all the time then sooner or later some will have been 'perfect'

try and think about what opponent you're targeting with you bluffs, what range of hands he's representing (combination of his actions and board texture) and then understand if future cards help you apply pressure to the range of hands that it looks like he could have (his range).


blsmur wrote:


i did some excellent bluffs today so i am thinking i got them pretty good


i have problem adjusting properly to call stns  and still try to bluff them



in general if i am unsure if i have the best hand now i just ck it down as opposed to trying to get him to fold

I kind of covered this a couple of time.

blsmur wrote:


Or if you thought a guy was playing tight and/ or weak why would you go crazy with second bottom pair? Where in the course does it say go crazy with second bottom pair vs a tight/ weak player?

obviously get this wrong a fair bit



But why do you? That is the question, why?

I have no idea why i was doing that   I havent done it today   thank God



For every move you make in poker you should have a sound, logical reason for your action.

Where did you get the game plan to go ape with second bottom pair when a tight player shows strength?

I'm not digging you out, just trying to get to the root of your problems.

point  taken thanks


You also said you're struggling to adjust to the 'hybrid players' so I have specially made a video just for you and anyone else out there that finds this hard.

It covers how I think when breaking down a players game even further than just trying to put them in a stereotypical box.

The email will be coming out later with the video link as soon as it has finished rendering.

Broker


i watched it  and thankyou  i thought it might have been for me  or you had me in mind when you make it
blsmur

hi well i have won the 9 out of my last 13 games on will hill

BR just $6.60

I think the questions and answers from Broker have helped

so just letting you know i not dead yet

i also played a 9 man sngo last night on PS  

and the whole reason for coming here was to be able to play the HU part better

see what you think here
http://www.viddler.com/explore/blsmur/videos/4/
doodiewiz

your video is still not showing for me...
kolonel

works for me, just tested it and downloading now.

blsmur, what settings are you using for the video production as you can reduce the size of the video file, without losing too much quality.

if your internet is anything like mine, uploading over 100mb takes forever.
blsmur

kolonel wrote:
works for me, just tested it and downloading now.

blsmur, what settings are you using for the video production as you can reduce the size of the video file, without losing too much quality.

if your internet is anything like mine, uploading over 100mb takes forever.


it came in slightly bigger format than usual but it only 69meg   so i think that is fine

not sure if viddler make it bigger i export it from camtasia as mp4
blsmur

just a note

when i first upload it and make the link i discovered i uploaded the wrong file  so i edited the post and upload the right file then it take a while to ready on viddler
blsmur

hi I am doing ok today again  and have made it up to $10 in the account and move back to $2 buyins

i win 7 out of last 10 games

i have also been playing on pokerstars at the same time   and winning in there too


I am much more sure of the way I am playing then ever before   and when i fold i dont feel like i am giving up the best hand

as some of these guys will not fold any pair
AxeMage

Good job! Keep it up!!
doodiewiz

Well it wasn't pretty was it? Lol! You said when u were winning before you were 'tight, very tight' but you were well loosey goosey in this video IMO and quite spewy!

The call station on your left I would have just raised reasonable hands and bet straight up for value postflop as he likes calling so much. Thing is you say he's loose/aggro and likes to call an then you don't seem to implement the appropriate strategy. Anyway I'm glad your winning dude and GL!
blsmur

doodiewiz wrote:
Well it wasn't pretty was it? Lol! You said when u were winning before you were 'tight, very tight' but you were well loosey goosey in this video IMO and quite spewy!

The call station on your left I would have just raised reasonable hands and bet straight up for value postflop as he likes calling so much. Thing is you say he's loose/aggro and likes to call an then you don't seem to implement the appropriate strategy. Anyway I'm glad your winning dude and GL!



thanks for your comments yes i think i need to not call on weak flops the way i do
but i was trying to catch hands that i could afford to try and catch
this was how i used to play with out the little steals here n there  so now i add in the steals i had enough chips most of the time to try and catch something or to wait if i felt that was the right thing to do

i have a review with broker live next week  
that should be good wish i could have gotten that a long time ago
any way here hoping he can help me with  reads and better decisions overall

btw i won 9 of my last ten game on will hill and  that is good so i am getting some reads and making decisions based on that

i tried a few of the 500 chip game on stars they not a great game for me
i have done ok
and i get my stars stack to $20 from yesterday it was $10 as i gave some money away to my son and left me with $10

i might upload some tomorrow for the tourneys or maybe wait till next week with daylight saving due it will be 2 hours later to get up
havnt played them since daylight saving changed last time in march this year

the will hill Bank roll is now $18 from $2 yesterday morning  so that is the most promising my play has been for the last few months

hopefully i can get some good value with Broker this week
Very Happy
blsmur

well this is my last post in this thread

I have played 350 games and lost  $37 out of a $35 buyin

i dont like the site much at all

and i havnt done well  
but most of my play in here has been while i was building
Electronics , this is not a good idea

It has taken away from my ability because of a lack of concentration on the game

i will continue with my other thread from now on  , not sure why i ended up with 2 threads anyway

I have completed my obligation on will hill  for the updated course from Brokerstar

maybe Broker will see it in his heart to give me the last game review

dunno

any way  if you want to see what I am up to from now on
check my other thread

http://tagpoker.myfastforum.org/about2952.html
       Tagpoker Forum Forum Index -> Bankroll Building (All Members)
Page 1 of 1